Vlt2 task3 full#
Vlt2 task3 iso#

I did it at first and it depressed me and led to wasted time. My advice: I found out that it doesn't pay to stress too much with these graders. Unless recently updated, there are tip sheets for all tasks. Look in the course chatter or course tips section.

Vlt2 task3 iso#

i.e for Risk Management, it's section 5.2 of ISO 27002. If not, state it that a policy doesn't exist therefore such a section doesn't exist and post a justification. If it states that a policy exists, then justify the need for such a section. If it states that a policy exists, mark it and justify per ISO27002, if not, then say so.įor that question posted, find out from the risk assessment again. I really feel, WGU should look at MS ISA VLT2 course and their for originality scores. Turnitin itself is flawed it was flagging 82% originality score for my own wordings?!! If WGU is so perfect why having a 1997 technology (MS Access) in a course like this, checked by a flawed turnitin system?!! The tasks that were evaluated in 12-24 hours time which now takes 72 hours or more!! It seems like one of the strategies of WGU slowing down a student who is in accelerated the completion path. A total of 9-10 days were lost just by waiting to know the results whereas earlier almost all other papers were evaluated within 24 hours. I cannot assume anything other than monetary benefits for sending the tasks back without proper explanations creating unusual delays in evaluations and hindering progress forward. WGU it seems are making unethical ways to slow down a student from completing their tasks on time and completing their course!!! It looks like there is a deliberate attempt to find as many faults in a VLT2 tasks and trying to discourage students who spend hours, days and months to complete these tasks.

Vlt2 task3 full#

In 2015 trying to reason MS Access 97 on security course like this?!! Trying explain a dead technology after 18 years?!! Does anyone in WGU really care? Take a deep look at this course or is this just a filler course to make students struggle at the end? Internet blogs are full of bad reviews for this course by many students current and previous. The description of the scenario is very limited and students have to guess what technologies were to be used in a scenario and what documentations need to be used and referred!! The task requirement does not clearly mention what is expected for each task starting from task1 to task4. This ofcourse, will need to be repeated on the VLT peer Switch as well, and the values that need changing will have to changed.The course tasks that does not reflect any real world scenarios. IP address of the interface on the remote VLT peer to be used as the endpoint of the VLT backup link for sending out-of-band hello messages.Īssociate the port channel to the corresponding port channel in the VLT peer for the VLT connection to an attached device.Ĭhannel # 2 is the downstream PoCH to the server, on each peer. Peer-link port-channel command in the Enable VLT Here, i am connecting an in-band 元 link back-to-back between the peers.Įnter the same port-channel number configured with the You must configure the backup link before you can configure the VLT trunk interconnect.

Here, i will provide a quick configuration sample on getting VLT operational between two VLT peer (S4810) switches. This is unlike stacking, where the entire fabric must be taken down for upgrades etc. The other benefit is that due to distinct control planes, it is possible to perform maintenance one switch at a time without taking the entire fabric down. in this context, VLT resembles what stacking offers. VLT is beneficial in environments where the downstream devices like servers or access/distribution switches need to build port channels/LAGs across two separate upstream switches. I have already given a non-technical synopsis on VLT in one of my previous posts here Īs mentioned, VLT Is a Dual Active Control Plane implementation, of a Multi System LAG.